Gwent Police Response to the Health and Social Care Committee re Social Services and Wellbeing (Wales) Act
The intention to bring together local authorities’ and partners’ duties and functions in relation to improving wellbeing is generally welcomed. Whilst there is a need for legislation and guidance to guide the way that services are delivered to people by public services, simplifying this would be beneficial to services and citizens who sometimes have to negotiate complex systems to get what they need. There is potential reduce bureaucracy and release wider system capacity and energy to focus on delivering services that improve outcomes for people.
Yes, however, much of the detail will need to be included in regulations.
A consistent focus on need and demand across the principality will lead to better service. It will enable more effective joint working and has potential for greater collaboration.
The move to focusing on outcomes is welcomed. Streamlining the large number of policies, laws, regulations will potentially reduce bureaucracy and speed up processes.
Using the definition of wellbeing will potentially mean that large numbers of the community who would not previously have involvement with Social Services will request assessments of their needs. The impact on Local Authorities is as yet unknown and requires further exploration.
Regionalising Safeguarding Children Boards is welcomed. . The main concern of members is the loss of local links that has been the focus of much of the work of the Local Boards in South East Wales. The challenge will be establishing a Board that has an overview of local practice in five Local Authority areas.
It is better that only those issues that require legislative change be included in the legislation and that all other guidance be included in regulation.
This may be required and provides for a level of flexibility to create supportive elements for the legislation which may only become apparent as the changes brought about by the law evolve.
Please see previous comments in relation to resources.
No.